Yup, no problems here...

It will get heated. Can't take it, don't open the forum.
Forum rules
We tolerate extreme views, assuming no actual discrimination against board-members occurs. We will let snowflakes melt from the heat.
Post Reply
User avatar
Reign in Blood
Administrator
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 11:29 am

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Reign in Blood »

The air quotes from the peanut gallery are going off the chain today!
Image
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

Jmac Attack wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:"I always appreciated Trump's racism. One of his finest qualities, along with his sexism."

- Basically every Trump supporter.
And being a chronic cheater on his wives. Role model for the religious right. Cheating on your spouse these days is the Alpha male thing to do. :P Such morals.
Just curious, which of his policies would you like better if he was faithful to his wife?
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... sts-221305

Lol liberals. As if there is anything that doesn't cause them anxiety and conflict.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

Speaking of derangement. My cousin helped us out at a big catering yesterday. She was asking about our fiance visa, and I was telling her about the process, paperwork, and wait. I also told her my fiance has been denied a tourist visa to the US twice to visit family in the US. That was when she went on an anti-Trump tirade. I listened for about five minutes before telling her the denials were under Obama.
User avatar
zombie
Administrator
Posts: 11971
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:28 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by zombie »

Foo wrote:https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... sts-221305

Lol liberals. As if there is anything that doesn't cause them anxiety and conflict.
i feel like most elected officials, especially presidents, will cause anxiety in some percentage of the population. why should trump be different?
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... sts-221305

Lol liberals. As if there is anything that doesn't cause them anxiety and conflict.
i feel like most elected officials, especially presidents, will cause anxiety in some percentage of the population. why should trump be different?
I am not a psychologist, nor do I have such an illness. I don't recall such outbreaks under Obama.
User avatar
zombie
Administrator
Posts: 11971
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:28 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by zombie »

Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
Foo wrote:https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... sts-221305

Lol liberals. As if there is anything that doesn't cause them anxiety and conflict.
i feel like most elected officials, especially presidents, will cause anxiety in some percentage of the population. why should trump be different?
I am not a psychologist, nor do I have such an illness. I don't recall such outbreaks under Obama.
a lot of people seemed to be anxious about obama. it's played up more with turmp/hillary, but yeah.
User avatar
Jigsaw
Charter Member
Posts: 3906
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Jigsaw »

Is Foo joking? I remember a lot of conservatives afraid that Obama would come for their guns, anxious to death about that. It never happened, on a side-note, but the anxiety was there. I remember it clearly.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
User avatar
zombie
Administrator
Posts: 11971
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:28 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by zombie »

yeah w. bush is where it seemed to start getting bad. or could just be that i was aware of it for the first time.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

Jigsaw wrote:Is Foo joking? I remember a lot of conservatives afraid that Obama would come for their guns, anxious to death about that. It never happened, on a side-note, but the anxiety was there. I remember it clearly.
I bet you don't remember any of that. I bet you remember liberals stating that is why. I manage a gun club kitchen as part of the food business, and literally the only thing they were worried about was certain types of guns being banned, which was real and discussed. There was zero panic.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

zombie wrote:
yeah w. bush is where it seemed to start getting bad. or could just be that i was aware of it for the first time.
I do believe the spawning of the internet changed a lot of things. Making a citizens arrest of the cabinet members and shit is pretty crazy. In the past, it would not have been a thing to do because you would not get attention from it.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

https://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/0 ... rol-002064

Being that he constantly pushed for gun control, wouldn't it make some sense that people with guns would discuss it?

Compare that to the totally illogical liberals on Trump and Roe v Wade. Republicans controlled all branches of government, and yet, no push for it.
User avatar
zombie
Administrator
Posts: 11971
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:28 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by zombie »

Foo wrote:
zombie wrote:
yeah w. bush is where it seemed to start getting bad. or could just be that i was aware of it for the first time.
I do believe the spawning of the internet changed a lot of things. Making a citizens arrest of the cabinet members and shit is pretty crazy. In the past, it would not have been a thing to do because you would not get attention from it.
the wide attention and globalization of regular people that the internet brought is probably a lot to do with it.
User avatar
showa58taro
Administrator
Posts: 8729
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:29 pm
Location: London, England

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by showa58taro »

Foo wrote:https://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/0 ... rol-002064

Being that he constantly pushed for gun control, wouldn't it make some sense that people with guns would discuss it?

Compare that to the totally illogical liberals on Trump and Roe v Wade. Republicans controlled all branches of government, and yet, no push for it.
No push? Half the USP of B-Kav was his likely amenability to it.
Image
User avatar
Jigsaw
Charter Member
Posts: 3906
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:21 pm
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Jigsaw »

Foo wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Is Foo joking? I remember a lot of conservatives afraid that Obama would come for their guns, anxious to death about that. It never happened, on a side-note, but the anxiety was there. I remember it clearly.
I bet you don't remember any of that. I bet you remember liberals stating that is why. I manage a gun club kitchen as part of the food business, and literally the only thing they were worried about was certain types of guns being banned, which was real and discussed. There was zero panic.
I literally remember some conservatives literally worried that Obama was literally going to ban guns and take away their firearms, so you literally just lost that bet.
For my thoughts on the horror films I've seen, please look here: https://jigsawshorrorcorner.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Jason
Administrator
Posts: 20550
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:14 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Jason »

Jigsaw wrote:Is Foo joking? I remember a lot of conservatives afraid that Obama would come for their guns, anxious to death about that. It never happened, on a side-note, but the anxiety was there. I remember it clearly.
The left still want to take away guns. But they are also afraid of getting shot.
Image
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

showa58taro wrote:
Foo wrote:https://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/0 ... rol-002064

Being that he constantly pushed for gun control, wouldn't it make some sense that people with guns would discuss it?

Compare that to the totally illogical liberals on Trump and Roe v Wade. Republicans controlled all branches of government, and yet, no push for it.
No push? Half the USP of B-Kav was his likely amenability to it.
You need to stop reading liberal lies. Show any facts that support that, rather than just wild speculation? Abortion is settled. You might see challenges against late term stuff, but only monsters don't see a problem with those procedures anyway.
User avatar
Foo
Administrator
Posts: 5387
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:45 pm

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Foo »

Jigsaw wrote:
Foo wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Is Foo joking? I remember a lot of conservatives afraid that Obama would come for their guns, anxious to death about that. It never happened, on a side-note, but the anxiety was there. I remember it clearly.
I bet you don't remember any of that. I bet you remember liberals stating that is why. I manage a gun club kitchen as part of the food business, and literally the only thing they were worried about was certain types of guns being banned, which was real and discussed. There was zero panic.
I literally remember some conservatives literally worried that Obama was literally going to ban guns and take away their firearms, so you literally just lost that bet.
they were worried about stupid laws, not complete bans. That was what Obama was discussing, two guns could be identical in function but look different and one would be banned and one not. They feared stupidity.
Jmac Attack
Charter Member
Posts: 5402
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 10:20 am

Re: Yup, no problems here...

Post by Jmac Attack »

Foo wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:
Foo wrote:
Jigsaw wrote:Is Foo joking? I remember a lot of conservatives afraid that Obama would come for their guns, anxious to death about that. It never happened, on a side-note, but the anxiety was there. I remember it clearly.
I bet you don't remember any of that. I bet you remember liberals stating that is why. I manage a gun club kitchen as part of the food business, and literally the only thing they were worried about was certain types of guns being banned, which was real and discussed. There was zero panic.
I literally remember some conservatives literally worried that Obama was literally going to ban guns and take away their firearms, so you literally just lost that bet.
they were worried about stupid laws, not complete bans. That was what Obama was discussing, two guns could be identical in function but look different and one would be banned and one not. They feared stupidity.
I remember a shit ton of guys at work, at my shows, and on the internet (Facebook, Bengals forum, etc), saying that Obama and the Dems are not only trying to take guns from citizens, but they also had a fear of them enacting Marshall Law. Idiots are everywhere man. It's not just one side.
Post Reply